Black square overlapping a white circle on a black background.

BestPractice.Club

Pattern:

 

Orient

Sensing that something needs attention — but not yet sure what kind of change is forming.

This is the most common starting point for what eventually becomes a significant capability investment journey. Many experienced leaders are surprised to find themselves here.

Description

If you are in a period of orientation — sensing that something in your supply chain capability needs attention but without a clearly named initiative, timeline, or investment in view — this is the most common starting point for what eventually becomes a significant capability investment journey.

Many experienced leaders are surprised to find themselves here. That reaction is common and usually reflects the complexity of the situation rather than the maturity of the team. Supply chain capability investment decisions are rarely straightforward. The organisations that navigate them well are often the ones that slowed down deliberately at this stage rather than reaching for a solution before the problem was fully understood.

This stage is not passive. It is where experienced leaders clarify what they are actually trying to achieve, why it matters now, and what good would genuinely look like if they got this right. The work here is less about choosing a solution and more about understanding what kind of organisation, capability, or operating model you are really working towards.

You can't predict the behaviour of a system by studying its parts.

Donella Meadows

Where teams tend to get stuck

Teams at this stage often feel pressure to do something before the problem is fully understood — particularly when signals are coming from multiple directions simultaneously.

Common patterns include jumping prematurely to solution areas before the root cause is clear; conflating symptoms with root causes and treating the visible performance gap as the problem rather than investigating what is producing it; and struggling to articulate the issue clearly enough for others to engage meaningfully.

A related challenge is that different functions are often working from different mental models at this stage. Supply chain, finance, IT, and leadership may all be using different language to describe the same situation. Until those differences are surfaced, teams can appear aligned on the surface while talking past each other underneath.

You can't understand a complex problem without understanding the people who live inside it.

Megan Smith

What's harder to see from the inside

The assumption most practitioners at this stage are operating on is that the problem is one of information... that with enough research, enough peer conversations, enough events, the right direction will eventually become clear.

What tends to keep people stuck at the orient stage is not a shortage of information. It is that the information available is almost entirely supply-side: vendor content calibrated to lead toward a solution, analyst frameworks describing an idealised maturity journey, and peer conversations that confirm the struggle is real without helping to name it precisely enough to act on. The question that tends to unlock movement is not "what should I do?" but "what is the specific thing that is limiting performance, and is my read of it correct?" Those are different questions, and the second one is much harder to answer from inside the organisation.

The outside-in view at this stage tends to surface not a direction but a more accurate framing of the problem, which is usually more useful, because a well-framed problem has a much shorter list of plausible responses.

BPC's outside-in view at this stage comes from practitioners who have been through comparable decision journeys in comparable organisations. Tell us about your context and we can find the most relevant starting point.

In-person · London ·12 November 2026

Test Your Thinking

A full day for practitioners focusing on how you gain the clarity and build the confidence to commit capital, credibility and organisational energy to a capability investment — and stay confident as the journey unfolds. Peer-led, discussion-first, no pitches.

Find out more Register your interest →

Related to this Pattern on this page

Perspectives articles

James Moffatt on Why Data, Economics and Short-Termism Hold Supply Chains Back

James Moffatt of Baringa explains why supply chain transformation so often stalls before technology becomes the constraint. From fragile data foundations and misaligned outsourcing economics to short-term leadership incentives, he outlines the structural barriers that slow progress—and why the only viable route to automation, resilience and decarbonisation is a deliberate, step-by-step maturity journey rather than a single leap to an ideal future state.
March 28, 2025

Prof. Glenn Parry on Value, Trust and the Future of Composable Supply Chains

Professor Glenn Parry of Surrey Business School has spent 25 years researching value in supply chains, servitisation and ecosystem orchestration. In this conversation with JP Doggett, he explains why ERP remains a one-size-fits-nobody solution, why value must be specified before transformation is attempted, how composability offers deeper resilience than visibility dashboards, and why trust is always the deciding factor in whether technology-led change actually holds.
July 17, 2025

From School Disco to Sandbox: Why Supply Chains and Startups Still Find it Hard to Dance

Supply chain operators and startups want to work together. Both sides report the same frustrations. This article, drawing on conversations with founders, investors and supply chain leaders, examines why the gap persists: career risk on the operator side, trust and integration barriers in procurement, the fragility of internal champions, and what a portfolio approach to innovation might look like if operators borrowed thinking from investors.
September 17, 2025

Online sessions

Making Sense of the Options Before You Commit to One

Timing: Thu 16 Jul · 15:00 BST · 60 minutes

Focus: Supply chain leaders who are earlier in their planning transformation journey — new in role, new to a capability area, or not yet clear on the specific problem they are trying to solve.

Format: Practitioner-led peer discussion facilitated by BestPractice.Club

No Hosts. No Agenda. Off the Record.

Once a month, a small group of senior supply chain leaders gets on a call with no agenda, no host and no record. The conversation goes wherever it goes. Nothing is minuted, nothing is shared externally, and nobody is pitching anything.

Sessions run on the first Friday of each month at 12.30 UK time, for 60 minutes. Places are limited to keep the conversation genuinely open.

If you have something on your mind that you would not say in a recorded session, this is the place for it.

In-person meetings

Plenary / panels / enabler sessions

None upcoming.

Capability-focused roundtable discussions

Network design for resilience & agility

  • Where are the vulnerabilities in your network that you've identified but haven't yet tested under a real scenario, and what's stopping that test from happening?
  • Is redesigning for resilience actually a network question, or is it being treated as one because that's where the tools and the budget conversation already exist?
  • What would it take to know whether a targeted redesign would fund further agility, rather than assuming it on the strength of the business case alone?
  • How do you tell the difference between a vulnerability worth redesigning around and one you're better off pricing as accepted risk?
November 12, 2026
 · 
Central London, UK
 · 
Autumn 2026 Meeting

A quick note on how to read this

BestPractice.Club is not a consultancy and does not provide advisory services based on full organisational discovery.

What you see here reflects pattern recognition drawn from many years of conversations with supply chain and operations leaders facing real, high-stakes decisions. It is intended to help you orient yourself, clarify your decision position, and understand what often proves useful at similar points — not to provide definitive advice tailored to your specific circumstances.

Any suggestions are indicative, not exhaustive, and are made without full visibility of your organisation, constraints, or risk profile. Decisions remain yours, and should be tested against your own data, context, and governance processes.

If a pattern doesn’t quite fit, that’s normal. They are distilled from many examples from varying contexts. Decisions rarely move in straight lines with teams often revisiting earlier stages as new information emerges. If it would help to talk through your situation and sense-check where you are, you’re welcome to schedule a short conversation.