Online Discussion

What's Limiting Your S&OP? It's Not the Process. It's the People.

S&OP works in theory, but making it work in practice can be much harder. Sound familiar?

Oct 22, 2026 11:00
12:00
BST
·
Online
For senior supply chain leaders only
How this meeting works
  • Practitioner-led working session
  • No pitches
  • Small-group, facilitated discussion
  • Works best when you can engage actively
  • Chatham House Rule
  • Limited places to preserve quality

Suggested Discussion Points

  • Meetings that are more about reporting than decision-making – focused on reviewing what’s happened rather than making the decisions needed to move forward.
  • Meetings that are poorly attended and prepared for – without the right people, preparation or engagement to make them effective.
  • Decisions that aren’t supported by the data – when the information provided doesn’t support the discussion or the decisions that need to be made.
  • Decisions that don’t stick – agreed in the room, but without the authority or support behind them to make them happen.
  • Lack of clarity on ownership – who owns a decision once it leaves the room, and who notices when it starts to unravel?

Discussion Host(s)

Confirmed
 
Founder and CEO
SP / Consultant

Discussion Co-Host(s)

To be confirmed.

Moderator(s)

To be confirmed.

Why this session exists

S&OP is one of the few processes in supply chain that almost every organisation has, and almost every leader privately admits isn't working the way it's meant to. The meetings happen. The calendar invites go out. And still, decisions that should get made in that room don't get made, or get made and then quietly unravel a few weeks later. This session starts from the assumption that the mechanics are rarely the real problem. Something upstream, how the organisation is structured, who's actually accountable, what gets rewarded, is usually doing the damage.

What you'll leave with

  • A clearer read on where your own S&OP process is actually breaking down, not where the textbook says it should
  • Patterns from other organisations that have worked through the same friction
  • A sharper sense of whether your issue is process, data, attendance, or something structural underneath all three
  • Questions worth raising internally before the next cycle, rather than another framework to implement

Who this meeting is for

This meeting is designed for people working through real operational and innovation decisions, rather than those seeking presentations or general inspiration.

Who for

Supply chain and planning leaders, Director to VP, who own or sit close to S&OP and feel the gap between what the process is meant to do and what it's actually producing. Useful if S&OP runs but doesn't decide, or if decisions get made and then dissolve once the meeting ends.

Who not for

Vendors and consultants selling S&OP tooling or process redesign. Practitioners without visibility into why decisions stall, who'd get more from a different session. Anyone looking for a specific software recommendation rather than a look at what's underneath the process.

How the online session works

Each session is designed as an online equivalent of a small, in-room roundtable discussion — not a passive, webinar-style presentation.

The format adapts to the topic and the experience in the room:

  • Where participants already have strong knowledge, we typically start by inviting individuals to expand on specific points they have shared in advance. This helps surface real-world context quickly and anchors the discussion in practical experience.
  • Where the topic is less familiar or more specialised, we may begin with a short explainer to establish a shared baseline before opening up the discussion.

To support productive dialogue, we often invite a subject-matter expert to join the session. This may be someone from a vendor, consultancy, or independent background — sometimes from within the community, sometimes external.

Their role is not to pitch or present a solution. Instead, they listen carefully to the discussion and reflect back:

  • how similar challenges have been approached in comparable organisations
  • what has worked (and what hasn’t) in practice
  • concrete examples that help translate discussion into action

This balance is deliberate. Without it, sessions can drift into abstract debate or problem-sharing. With it, discussions stay grounded and participants leave with tangible ideas they can apply in their own context.

The emphasis throughout is on shared learning, practical insight, and forward progress, rather than polished presentations or predetermined answers.

What happens next